{"id":343,"date":"2026-06-12T11:05:22","date_gmt":"2026-06-12T11:05:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/shivanshuconsults.in\/?page_id=343"},"modified":"2026-06-18T20:29:09","modified_gmt":"2026-06-18T20:29:09","slug":"compatibility-software","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/shivanshuconsults.in\/index.php\/compatibility-software\/","title":{"rendered":"About Compatibility Software"},"content":{"rendered":"\n\n
\n\n
Tested, not trusted<\/div>\n

One Hundred Thousand Evaluations<\/h2>\n

\n Before I let this software speak to a single client, I made it face fifty thousand randomly\n generated couples in each mode: real ephemeris positions, births from 1970 to 2005, random\n times, fifteen Indian cities, the complete classical pipeline every time. Here is what an\n honest engine looks like under that pressure.\n <\/p>\n\n \n

\n \n \n HOW STRICT IS THE SCREEN?<\/text>\n 50,000 random couples per mode, full classical pipeline<\/text>\n\n \n TRADITIONAL MODE<\/text>\n \n \n 17.6% PASS<\/text>\n 82.4% rejected<\/text>\n\n \n LGBTQ MODE<\/text>\n \n \n 23.2% PASS<\/text>\n 76.8% rejected<\/text>\n\n \n Among the couples that pass (traditional mode):<\/text>\n \n \n \n Workable 61.9%<\/text>\n Good 35.3%<\/text>\n Excellent 2.8%<\/text>\n An Excellent verdict here is earned, never given.<\/text>\n <\/svg>\n
\n Figure: pass rates and quality tiers across 100,000 Monte Carlo evaluations, engine v2.0.23.\n <\/figcaption>\n <\/figure>\n\n \n
\n
\n
1 in 5<\/div>\n
random pairings clear the full classical screen<\/div>\n <\/div>\n
\n
27<\/div>\n
named classical factors feed the divorce-yoga screen alone<\/div>\n <\/div>\n
\n
< 7%<\/div>\n
of passing couples reach the Excellent tier<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n\n \n

Where rejections come from<\/h3>\n

\n Every rejection is attributed to a specific classical gate, and every report lists the exact\n factors behind it. In the traditional mode: divorce-yoga load above 15 points for either\n partner accounts for 72.1% of all couples, a composed final score below 50 for 6.6%,\n an individual marriage-dignity below the classical 40 threshold for 3.6%, and compounded\n pakka indications for the remainder.\n <\/p>\n\n \n

\n
Mathematics agrees with simulation<\/div>\n

\n The pass rate is also derivable on paper. Each classical factor has a knowable base rate:\n a given lord falls in a given house once in twelve charts, two planets share a sign once in\n twelve and stand within fifteen degrees in three of four such cases, and so on. Summing\n probability times points gives an expected divorce load near 13 with a spread near 9, which\n puts about 47% of individuals over the 15-point ceiling. Both partners clearing it is\n 0.53 squared, roughly 28%; both clearing the dignity threshold multiplies in another 0.69;\n the final-score floor trims the rest. The product lands at about 17 to 18 percent.\n The simulation measured 17.6. When theory and one hundred thousand trials agree to within\n half a point, the engine is doing exactly what the shastra it encodes says it should.\n <\/p>\n <\/div>\n\n \n

Reading these numbers honestly<\/h3>\n

\n Random pairings are not proposals. Real couples reach an astrologer already selected by\n family, community and their own instinct, so pass rates in practice run far higher than this\n baseline. What the baseline proves is discrimination: this engine does not flatter. It is\n built source-first on the Brihat Parashara Hora Shastra and Bhrigu Sutram, it applies the\n classical cancellations exactly as prescribed, and it is willing to say no. When it says yes,\n that yes has survived every screen the shastra prescribes.\n <\/p>\n\n

\n Book a Compatibility Reading<\/a>\n <\/p>\n

Study conducted on engine v2.0.23, June 2026. Method and full tables available on request.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Tested, not trusted One Hundred Thousand Evaluations Before I let this software speak to a single client, I made it face fifty thousand randomly generated couples in each mode: real ephemeris positions, births from 1970 to 2005, random times, fifteen Indian cities, the complete classical pipeline every time. Here is what an honest engine looks […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-343","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/shivanshuconsults.in\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/343","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/shivanshuconsults.in\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/shivanshuconsults.in\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shivanshuconsults.in\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/shivanshuconsults.in\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=343"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/shivanshuconsults.in\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/343\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":400,"href":"https:\/\/shivanshuconsults.in\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/343\/revisions\/400"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/shivanshuconsults.in\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=343"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}